Skip to main content

Cookie settings

We use cookies to ensure the basic functionalities of the website and to enhance your online experience. You can configure and accept the use of the cookies, and modify your consent options, at any time.

Essential

Preferences

Analytics and statistics

Marketing

Show original text Warning: Content might be automatically translated and not be 100% accurate.
This proposal has been rejected because:

This motion failed to meet the 66.6% threshold of support needed to be considered as an emergency motion. Therefore, this motion was not presented for consideration by membership.

Allowing in-person General Meetings

Avatar: Eric Gilmour Eric Gilmour Rejected
Introductory Statement
At the last general meeting, during the height of the pandemic, an amendment was made that prevents the Party from holding in-person only General Meetings. While that may have made sense at the time, over 2 years later this needs to be reviewed as in-person meetings are a critical part of social organizations such as political parties.
Emergency Motion Statement
Article 8.7 be amended to read: "A General Meeting may be held in person, online, or a hybrid of online and in person."
Type of Emergency Motion
A constitutional amendment to change the constitution or bylaws
Benefit
This amend gives the Party flexibility to host General Meetings in a way that makes sense for that particular cycle, either online, in person, or a hybrid of the two. Currently technological and organizational limits make hybrid meetings nearly impossible, hence preventing any in-person get togethers. The lack of in-person gathering hampers the ability of members and volunteers to connect with one another, forming bonds and connections, sharing stories and experience in formal and informal ways. So much happens outside the official programming of a meeting that can't be replicated in an online environment.
Who does this motion impact?
Party members, volunteers, and staff
Impact on exisiting GPC policy.
Not applicable (e.g., directive to council, constitutional amendment)
Green Values
Sustainability
Social Justice
Participatory Democracy
Supporting Evidence
Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
Unsure or Not applicable (e.g. directives and constitutional changes)
Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
English
Comment

Confirm

Please log in

Share