.png){kind=logo}
Changes at "EXAMPLE: Title of Policy Proposal "
Title
- -{"en"=>"Example: Title of Policy Proposal ", "machine_translations"=>{"fr"=>"Exemple : Titre de la proposition de politique "}}
- +{"en"=>"EXAMPLE: Title of Policy Proposal "}
Body
-
-["
- Introductory Text
- This section is where you provide the rationale or context for the policy. Aim to be factual, not speculative. Briefly identify the problem. This section is the equivalent of Whereas Statements. You do not have to use Whereas Statements.
- Proposal Statement (operative clause)
- This section is where the policy statement is entered. Public policy should be written to allow Green Party of Canada MPs the flexibility to choose any appropriate strategy or tactic to achieve the desired outcome.
- Type of Proposal
- Public policy that the party would represent
- Objective / Benefit
- This section is used to identify the benefit or goal of the policy statement, and why or how this policy is of benefit to Canadians.
- If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
- If this policy revises, replaces or removes an existing policy, identify the policy and the the impact. Example: replaces G22-P106, revises G22-P106, rescinds G22-P106.
- List any supporting evidence for your proposal
- This section is used to identify up to 5 references to support the policy proposal Strong references are free of bias and backed by evidence. Try to use primary sources (first hand evidence) or information.\nThe CRAAP test is helpful to evaluate the credibility of the source (reference):\nCurrency: Is the source up-to-date?\nRelevance: Is the source relevant to your research?\nAuthority: Where is the source published? Who is the author? Are they considered reputable and trustworthy in their field?\nAccuracy: Is the source supported by evidence? Are the claims cited correctly?\nPurpose: What was the motive behind publishing this source?\nAvoid using videos that contain clips that have been removed from the original source, as the secondary source may lack important context and could present biased information.
- Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the group or groups?
- This section is used to identify the stakeholder engagement used to develop the policy.
- Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
- Yes
- Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
- English
- Texte d'introduction
- Cette section présente la raison d'être ou le contexte de la politique. Essayez d'être factuel et non spéculatif. Identifiez brièvement le problème. Cette section est l'équivalent des considérants. Vous n'êtes pas obligé d'utiliser les considérants.
- Énoncé de la proposition (clause opérationnelle)
- C'est dans cette section qu'est inscrite la déclaration de politique générale. La politique publique devrait être rédigée de manière à permettre aux député(e)s du Parti Vert du Canada de choisir toute stratégie ou tactique appropriée pour atteindre le résultat souhaité.
- Type de proposition
- Politique publique que le parti représenterait
- Objectif / Bénéfice
- Cette section sert à identifier l'avantage ou l'objectif de la déclaration de politique générale, et à expliquer pourquoi ou comment cette politique est avantageuse pour les Canadiens.
- Si votre proposition remplace une ou plusieurs politiques existantes, laquelle remplace-t-elle ?
- Si cette politique révise, remplace ou supprime une politique existante, identifiez la politique et son impact. Exemple : remplace G22-P106, révise G22-P106, annule G22-P106.
- Énumérez toutes les preuves à l'appui de votre proposition
- Cette section permet d'identifier jusqu'à 5 références à l'appui de la proposition politique. Les références solides sont exemptes de préjugés et étayées par des preuves. Essayez d'utiliser des sources primaires (preuves de première main) ou des informations. Le test CRAAP est utile pour évaluer la crédibilité de la source (référence) : Actualité : La source est-elle à jour ? Pertinence : La source est-elle pertinente pour votre recherche ? Autorité : Où la source a-t-elle été publiée ? Qui en est l'auteur ? Est-il considéré comme réputé et digne de confiance dans son domaine ? Exactitude : La source est-elle étayée par des preuves ? Les affirmations sont-elles citées correctement ? Objectif : Quel était le motif de la publication de cette source ? Évitez d'utiliser des vidéos contenant des extraits retirés de la source originale, car la source secondaire peut manquer d'un contexte important et présenter des informations biaisées.
- La proposition affecte-t-elle un groupe particulier et quels efforts ont été déployés pour consulter ce ou ces groupes ?
- Cette section permet d'identifier l'engagement des parties prenantes dans l'élaboration de la politique.
- Compétence : Cette proposition relève-t-elle de la compétence fédérale ?
- Oui
- Veuillez indiquer la langue dans laquelle la proposition est soumise.
- Anglais
-
+["
- Introductory Text
- This section is where you provide the rationale or context for the policy. Aim to be factual, not speculative. Briefly identify the problem. This section is the equivalent of Whereas Statements. You do not have to use Whereas Statements.
- Proposal Statement (operative clause)
- This section is where the policy statement is entered. Public policy should be written to allow Green Party of Canada MPs the flexibility to choose any appropriate strategy or tactic to achieve the desired outcome. The policy statement (operative clause) is the only section of the Policy Proposal that will be entered into the Member Approved Policy (Green Book).
- Type of Proposal
- Public policy that the party would represent
- Objective / Benefit
- This section is used to identify the benefit or goal of the policy statement, and why or how this policy is of benefit to Canadians.
- If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
- Before submitting a policy to CMD, check the Green Book to ensure you are not submitting a duplicate or overlapping policy. If this policy proposal revises, replaces or removes an existing policy, identify the policy and the the impact. Example: replaces G22-P106, revises G22-P106, rescinds G22-P106.
- List any supporting evidence for your proposal
- This section is used to identify up to 5 references to support the policy proposal Strong references are free of bias and backed by evidence. Try to use primary sources (first hand evidence) or information. This applies to articles, research and videos. \nThe CRAAP test is helpful to evaluate the credibility of the source (reference):\nCurrency: Is the source up-to-date?\nRelevance: Is the source relevant to your research?\nAuthority: Where is the source published? Who is the author? Are they considered reputable and trustworthy in their field?\nAccuracy: Is the source supported by evidence? Are the claims cited correctly?\nPurpose: What was the motive behind publishing this source?\nAvoid using videos that contain clips that have been extracted from the original source, as the secondary source may lack important context and could present biased information. It is better practice to post the original video.
- Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the group or groups?
- This section is used to identify the stakeholder engagement used to develop the policy.
- Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
- Yes
- Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
- English
Share