Passer au contenu principal

Paramètres des cookies

Nous utilisons des cookies pour assurer les fonctionnalités de base du site Web et pour améliorer votre expérience en ligne. Vous pouvez configurer et accepter l'utilisation des cookies et modifier vos options de consentement à tout moment.

Essentiels

Préférences

Analyses et statistiques

Marketing

Accueil Activité Se connecter
Accueil
/ Structure interne /
Continuous Motion Development
/ (1B) Créer
Continuous Motion Development / (1B) Créer
Afficher le texte automatiquement traduit Attention : Le contenu peut être automatiquement traduit et ne pas être exact à 100%.

Changements sur "EXAMPLE: Title of Collaborative Draft (Policy) "

Avatar: Catherine Jones Catherine Jones 19/07/2024 12:49

Corps

  • Introductory Text
    This section is where you provide the rationale or context for the collaborative draft. Aim to be factual, not speculative. Briefly identify the problem. This section is the equivalent of Whereas Statements. You do not have to use Whereas Statements.
    Proposal Statement (operative clause)
    This section is where the policy statement is entered. Public policy should be written to allow Green Party of Canada MPs the flexibility to choose any appropriate strategy or tactic to achieve the desired outcome.
  • The policy statement is the only section of the policy that will be entered into the Green Policy Book.
    • Type of Proposal
    Public policy that the party would represent
    Objective / Benefit
    This section is used to identify the benefit or goal of the policy statement, and why or how this policy is of benefit to Canadians.
    If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
    Before submitting a policy to CMD, check the Green Book to ensure you are not submitting a duplicate or overlapping policy. If this policy revises, replaces or removes an existing policy, identify the policy and the the impact. Example: replaces G22-P106, revises G22-P106, rescinds G22-P106.
    List any supporting evidence for your proposal
    This section is used to identify up to 5 references to support this collaborative draft. Strong references are free of bias and backed with evidence. Try to use primary sources (first hand evidence) or information.
  • -The CRAAP test is helpful to evlauate the credibility of the source:
  • -Currency: Is the source up-to-date? Relevance: Is the source relevant to your research?
  • +The CRAAP test is helpful to evaluate the credibility of the source:
  • +Currency: Is the source up-to-date?
  • +Relevance: Is the source relevant to your research?
  • Authority: Where is the source published? Who is the author? Are they considered reputable and trustworthy in their field?
  • Accuracy: Is the source supported by evidence? Are the claims cited correctly? Purpose: What was the motive behind publishing this source?
  • Avoid using videos that contain clips that have been extracted from the original source, as the secondary source may lack important context and could present biased information. Best practice to post the original video.
    • Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the group or groups?
    This section is used to identify the stakeholder engagement usedto develop the policy.
    Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
    Yes
    Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
    English

Valider

Veuillez vous connecter

Partager