.png){kind=logo}
Changements sur "EXAMPLE: Title of Collaborative Draft (Policy) "
Titre
- -Example: Title of Collaborative Draft
- +Example: Title of Collaborative Draft (Policy)
Corps
-
-
- Introductory Text
- Example: This section is where you provide the rationale or context for the collaborative draft. Aim to be factual, not speculative. Briefly identify the problem. This section is the eqivalent of Whereas Statements. You do not have to use Whereas Statements.
- Proposal Statement (operative clause)
- Example: This is where the policy statement is entered. Public policy should be written to allow GPC MPs the flexibility to choose any approporate strategy or tactic to acheive the desired outcome.
- -The policy statment is the only section of the policy that will be entered into the Green Policy Book.
- Type of Proposal
- Public policy that the party would represent
- Objective / Benefit
- This section is used to identify the benefit or goal of the policy statement, and why or how this policy is of benefit to Canadians.
- If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
- Review the Green Policy Book to ensure you are not submitting a duplicate policy. If this policy revises, replaces or removes an existing policy, identify the policy and then the impact Example: replaces G22-P106, revises G22-P106, rescinds G22-P106.
- List any supporting evidence for your proposal
- Insert references to support your policy in this section. Strong references are free of bias and backed with evidence. Try to use primary sources (first hand evidence) or information. The CRAAP test is helpful to evlauate the credibility of the source Currency: Is the source up-to-date? Relevance: Is the source relevant to your research? Authority: Where is the source published? Who is the author? Are they considered reputable and trustworthy in their field? Accuracy: Is the source supported by evidence? Are the claims cited correctly? Purpose: What was the motive behind publishing this source?
- Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the group or groups?
- Use this section to identify what stakeholder engagement was used in the development of the proposed policy.
- Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
- Yes
- Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
- English
-
+
- Introductory Text
- Example: This section is where you provide the rationale or context for the collaborative draft. Aim to be factual, not speculative. Briefly identify the problem. This section is the eqivalent of Whereas Statements. You do not have to use Whereas Statements.
- Proposal Statement (operative clause)
- Example: This section is where the policy statement is entered. Public policy should be written to allow GPC MPs the flexibility to choose any approporate strategy or tactic to acheive the desired outcome.
- +The policy statment is the only section of the policy that will be entered into the Green Policy Book.
- Type of Proposal
- Public policy that the party would represent
- Objective / Benefit
- This section is used to identify the benefit or goal of the policy statement, and why or how this policy is of benefit to Canadians.
- If your proposal replaces an existing policy or policies, which one does it replace?
- Review the Green Policy Book to ensure you are not submitting a duplicate policy. If this policy revises, replaces or removes an existing policy, identify the policy and then the impact. Example: replaces G22-P106, revises G22-P106, rescinds G22-P106.
- List any supporting evidence for your proposal
- This section is used to identify up to 5 references to support this collaborative draft. Strong references are free of bias and backed with evidence. Try to use primary sources (first hand evidence) or information. The CRAAP test is helpful to evlauate the credibility of the source Currency: Is the source up-to-date? Relevance: Is the source relevant to your research? Authority: Where is the source published? Who is the author? Are they considered reputable and trustworthy in their field? Accuracy: Is the source supported by evidence? Are the claims cited correctly? Purpose: What was the motive behind publishing this source?
- +Avoid using videos that contain edited clips from the original source, as they may lack important context and could present biased information.
- Does this proposal affect any particular group and what efforts have been made to consult with the group or groups?
- Use this section to identify what stakeholder engagement was used in the development of the proposed policy.
- Jurisdiction: Is this proposal under federal jurisdiction?
- Yes
- Please indicate the language the proposal is being submitted in.
- English
Partager